I’m embarrassed and sorry with how long I’ve been gone. After a leave of absence, I came to the realization that I need certain people. Those people include you-the reader-and the people mentioned on this site.
And I hope one contribution can be a sort of museum or display. I already have wonderful art I commissioned and received from talented artists.
Now, I can’t compete with the cool history blogs out there, but I hope to contribute to your interests.
Overall, I hope to learn more and then share what I learn about our friends from the past.
I can’t even imagine how you feel at the moment. I don’t want to, and people tell me to look away from the current situation. I’ve decided to step back, but I still know it’s important to be aware.
What feelings should I be feeling? I think I’m sort of relating to your very sad great-granddaughter-in-law. I don’t know what to do about it.
How should I be reacting?
Love from a descendant and another Sarah
Dear Sarah,
It’s me again. I researched you more and was wondering if you could also give me some business tips?
You seemed to constantly be hosting all kinds of guests—and under stress! I know we are the type that can laugh at things, but you seemed to master controlling a lot of feelings.
I wish you were alive to host a podcast.
Thanks and love from the 21st century.
Hi, Sarah!
You would probably never want to meet me. You’re also a Sarah I’d like to interview. I’m afraid you’d walk out of the room if I asked certain questions.
I think you’re very cool and though it sounds like you like to party, you would be very valuable in understanding issues from the past. If I were to get a correspondence, no celebs or cameras would be present.
Best wishes for you future, whatever that may be.
Respectfully from another Sarah
To Sarah:
Lots of world events have occurred since I last wrote about you. I’ve also gone through many changes; I’ve seen people step up and take matters into their own hands, similar to you.
The people I’ve seen have actual talent, but I know it’s okay to ask. I’m too afraid to write any requests though. Come to think about it, I’m more afraid to send it off. But why should I be anyway? Afterall, I have been asking lots of questions to others. Many never get back to me.
I wanted to ask you about who exactly I should ask for help on my projects. Your letters made a difference. People give lots of thanks thanks to you!
From,
Sarah
To Sarah:
Did you ever have a fall break? How did you spend it? If you were here today, how would you enjoy your short time off?
Madam Guillotine, Marie Antoinette, and sink me–The Scarlet Pimpernel. The 1982 film adaption of the book made me laugh so hard. I was also in awe. Did such heroes exist?
There were those who smuggled nobles into other countries. The films shows that Marie Antoinette and Louis’s son survived and was taken from their prison to a safer place.
Wrong.
The sole survivor was the king and queen’s daughter, Marie Thérèse. who clung on to some hope that maybe her brother and mother who were taken away had survived.
I can’t believed I went on for years not knowing about her–or her aunt Elisabeth, the king’s sister. Elisabeth made sacrifice after sacrifice for the royal family–refusing to marry or take other available routes that would take her out of the country. She endured violent attacks with them and even posed as the queen to buy her sister-in-law more time during one ambush. It’s little wonder that Marie Antoinette and Louis counseled their children to listen to their aunt.
All too soon the royal family was taken to the Temple Tower. They endured unfair trials and living conditions grew worse. The king was executed and little Louis was taken to a separate cell. Marie Antoinette was taken away and also executed, but Elisabeth and Marie-Therese only knew the king’s fate. However, I believe Elisabeth knew her sister-in-law was dead and had a strong feeling her nephew was slowly dying. Marie Thérèse had the best chance of surviving.
The heroic aunt. Elisabeth de France by Vigee-Lebrun.
When it was just Elisabeth and Marie Thérèse in the cell, Elisabeth comforted her niece. She was an example of piety, and Marie Thérèse said much of her survival was due to prayer. Elisabeth showed and advised her niece on how to groom herself, keep the cell as clean as possible, and how to handle the guards. It was just a matter of time before Elisabeth was taken away and was prepared to die a martyr. Marie Thérèse would not find out what happened to her aunt, mother, and brother till much later. The information that her aunt watched around twenty-five nobles executed before her and was purposely saved for last would be withheld.
Marie Thérèse was eventually freed and taken to Vienna in 1795 for safety.
The sole survivor. Portrait of Marie Thérèse of France by Heinrich Furger.
Marie Thérèse would go on to help royal refugees and raise troops against Napoleon dubbed her the “only man in the family.” She worked hard to preserve the memory of her family. The following comment about her aunt Elisabeth needs to be remembered.
“I feel I have her nature . . . [she] considered me and cared for me as her daughter, and I, I honored her as a second mother.”
I hope I have some of Princess Elisabeth in me. Her story sticks out to me. In times of tough decisions, I have thought of my role as an aunt. Princess Elisabeth is a wonderful role model. Her story is inspiring because it can make us think of ways we can be more loving toward our families.
With Mother’s Day being last week and wrapping up the subject of Moses in Sunday School, I am going to share part of an article called “Who Do You Admire?” by Brenda Combs
Jochebed, mother to Moses, here is a woman to admire! She had the courage to defy the Pharaoh no less and refused to condemn her son to death as so decreed. In our society we are surrounded with individuals who give in to popularity, fads, whims, and politically correctness but here was a woman who had everything to lose yet willingly put her child first despite what society wanted her to do. She had the creativity to hide him in a basket upon the Nile and care for him once the Pharaoh’s daughter claimed him took him to her heart. She only had him for a short time, but you can bet she taught him of the Lord’s way and loved him completely each and every second she had with him. Finally, she placed her confidence in God after all she could do and her children are examples to all who value strength, integrity, faithfulness and righteousness.
Side Note: I love having discussions with Brenda, and yesterday we talked about the heroine, Rahab, whose bravery helped Joshua and the Israelite army conquer Canaan. And the Bible will continue with women making sure that Israel goes forward.
Coming soon A royal aunt’s sacrifice in the French Revolution. A glimpse at my book in progress about a timeless and biblical princess plus Poet’s Profile.
Moses in his Mother’s Arms was painted by the British artist Simeon Solomon (1840–1905)
I was thinking of Elizabeth Barrett Browning last night. It’s probably because as she got older as a single maid, she got more ill, but she managed to go on with her work and eventually found true love. I wrote her a note last night/this morning. I decided just to do a little research and read she was born March 6!
So of course, I’ll have to include that birthday note to her!
I still can’t believe it! I was writing today thinking I should post my note, and I was determined after I discovered it was Mrs. Browning’s birthday!
Letter
EBB~
Elizabeth Barrett Browning-I keep you in mind as I age. Maybe when I’m 40, I’ll be married, but if not, what can I do? I’m not married yet or have your talent, and so it’s depressing. You had a lot going for you, but I bet it was hard. I have spinal and head problems myself. Perhaps I’m…of what was I going to say? No, I won’t ever know your genius or exact pain, but somehow you give me inspiration and my heart reaches out to you because you triumphed when it came to love. No one ever could have predicted what you ended up doing–eloping with such a seemingly eccentric poet. Maybe your husband eloping with someone–but not you! It’s cool that he took a chance on a 35-plus-year-old woman.
Birthday wishes,
~A 35+ woman
P.S. Upon further research, I’ve discovered just how much you fought for causes with all you had. So it’s not surprising that when you found the one, you went for it.
Elizabeth Barrett Browning and her husband, Robert Browning
Further Thoughts
I noticed I lost my thoughts in the middle of the letter. I really might be getting senile.
Anyway, I don’t have enough thoughts presently to even write a poem, but hopefully Elizabeth Barrett Browning would think this post is good enough.
Happy birthday, Mrs. Browning!
Images
Birthday cake image from pixabay.com, public domain.
Photograph of EBB and Robert Browning, public domain.
Engraving EBB, engraved by Thomas Oldhan Brown, public domain.
My tenth grade word history book inferred Marie Antoinette was a careless spender. A novel I read in college portrayed her as a loose woman.
Of course that’s been years, and through surprising study and realizations, I came to discover that the messages those writers conveyed were lies. I usually roll my eyes every time a piece of entertainment comes out about Marie Antoinette because it includes slander–and the filmmakers make lots of money from it.
Usually, I can get over it to a reasonable degree. After seeing a recent trailer, though, I can’t this time. I immediately wanted to find production and say:
In the name of all that’s good, stop!
Stop defaming the name of Marie Antoinette.
Stop defaming the name of her husband, Louis XVI.
Stop defaming the names of their faithful friends and family.
This question started out at the airport. But it started with the Internet search, “pharaoh during Moses’ time.” I’m still wondering what Moses’ time in Egypt was like, and I was surprised that Hatshepsut was mentioned in a possible timeline.
She was included in the article, “Who Were the Egyptian Pharaohs During the Time of Moses?” The article discusses Alfred J Hoerth’s book Archaeology and the Old Testament where he presents an interesting timeline, and Rameses II–a pharaoh usually included in Moses’ story–isn’t that present. Instead, the article talks about the possibility that the pharaoh that eventually let the slaves go was Thutmose III, the stepson/nephew of Hatshepsut.
It’s said Thutmose III was responsible for making Hatshepsut disappear from history.
What I mean by “disappear” is that it was him who tore down her monuments, hid her achievements, and had her pictures scratched out from the wall art.
Back to the airport, I went to YouTube to a Horrible Histories’ sketch I vaguely remember watching about Hatshepsut.
If the video is taken off the Internet, the history you “learn” from it is that Hatshepsut ruled for nearly 22 years, but was probably murdered by her stepson, and then he erased her from history. He was super mad.
It’s a great story, and I love Horrible Histories. But I decided to do a more thorough search.
Well, it was a quick search. My plane was boarding shortly. I scanned some information, and the only information I remembered was she made her stepson head of the army.
I thought about that fact for the whole flight.
Taking a Dig?
So, after I got to my destination and during some free time, I watched a documentary titled Hatshepsut: Secrets of Egypt’s Lost Queen. It’s a about archeologists and other historians examining her life and mummy candidates to see if they could find her.
What stood out to me most was the excitement of those involved in the project. I totally get it. You want to meet a person in history so badly, and this is chance to get close! There were discovered, little trinkets probably owned by Hatshepsut, and I would love to get my hands on something owned my one of my historical heroes!
And of course I was impressed how they narrowed the mummies to one candidate.
If you accept that candidate to be her, then Hatshepsut wasn’t murdered. (Sorry, Horrible Histories.) The documentary reports she died from a tooth infection/disease. Other reports showed diabetes or bone cancer. Whatever the case, she wasn’t killed by someone else.
Then the documentary shifts to a team also looking at certain wall art where they discovered where her images had been. But the images had been scratched away, and they had been replaced with images of Amenhotep II, who happened to be the son of Thutmose III.
The commentators said this action was probably taken for Amenhotep II to have a stronger claim to the throne, and that the throne is usually passed down from father to son.
Plus, Thutmose III didn’t go on a rampage right after her death to destroy Hatshepsut’s legacy. He removed her from history when he got older. Like two decades later. There’s a good chance that Thutmose III wasn’t taking a dig at his stepmother.
She wasn’t the only ruler carved out of Egyptian history–even men were. It was a strategic move to avoid future conflicts. It is sad, but that’s the way it was.
If the documentary was right in their claims, I’d like to imagine she celebrated when found.
Wrapping It Up
Gathering other information, Hatshepsut prepared her stepson very well to rule. I’ve concluded that Hatshepsut practically gift-wrapped Egypt for him.
To Thutmose III With Love, Hatshepsut
Ancient Egypt rulers were unlikely to predict the way good technology that was to come. (I’m always surprised with new tech that comes out myself.) Maybe Thutmose III meant to do a sloppy job. But that’s just a speculation.
I believe Hatshepsut and Thutmose III were more of a team than enemies.
Other Thoughts
In one of Simon Whistler’s videos on Hatshepsut, he reflects on remembering Hatshepsut, and how she was unsure how or if she would be remembered.
In case you didn’t make it through this whole video, Mr. Whistler quotes the female phaoroh saying:
“Now my heart turns this way and that, as I think what the people will say. Those who see my monuments in years to come, and who shall speak of what I have done.”
Hatshepsut
I think Hatshepsut’s story offers hope people who think they’ll be forgotten.
But the forgotten part can be temporary…even if thousands of years go by!
“Where ever there’s water, there’s people,” says my biblical lands instructor during each lesson.
So, of course, the well is a popular place. It’s a great place to meet people!
It was somewhat romantic when Jacob met Rachel at the well. He knew she was the one he was looking for, and he helped water the sheep, gave her a kiss, and then she ran to her dad.
Zipporah (a.k.a. Tzipora or Sephora), and Moses had a similar experience, but a little different…
So Moses had been on the run because Egypt’s leader found out Moses had killed an Egyptian who had been attacking a fellow Hebrew. To quote Moses’ flight:
Moses fled from the face of Pharaoh, and dwelt in the land of Midian: and he sat down by a well.
[How long Moses had been in Midian, I don’t know. Maybe he knew a few people before the following incident.]
Now the priest of Midian had seven daughters: and they came and drew water, and filled the troughs to water their father’s flock.
And the shepherds came and drove them away: but Moses stood up and helped them, and watered their flock.
I think I can speak for many women when I say guys helping and caring for animals are very attractive! The perfect gentleman who’s good with animals. Can’t get much better than that!
Let’s check out some of Hollywood’s famous dramatizations of that famous “meeting.”
The Ten Commandments:
Well, in the both the movie and Exodus account, there were seven daughters, a well, sheep, and bad guys…I think that’s what the movie got right. Even though I’m not too sure if the girls flirted with him, I do love the heroic music and observation comments!
The Prince of Egypt:
Huh…four daughters shown. I wonder where the other three are hiding. But the film does feature a well, sheep, and bad guys. This encounter in the film is Moses and Zipporah’s second meeting, which isn’t accurate. But there is a possibility he liked her, but let’s get back to the scriptural text about what the daughters did after Moses helped them:
And when they came to Reuel their father, he said, How is it that ye are come so soon to day?
And he said unto his daughters, And where is he? why is it that ye have left the man? call him, that he may eat bread.
I find the daughters’ father hilarious. His daughters were just being cautious. I can imagine that the daughters were caught off guard and awkwardly said they had to go after the chores was done.
It’s the type of thing I would do. My dad has reacted similarly. One example was when a cute guy (I knew already) asked to give me a ride. I said no. When I told my dad about it, he said, “You should have said yes!”
Reuel (referred to as Jethro later in the text) and Moses hit it off.
And Moses was content to dwell with the man: and he gave Moses Zipporah his daughter.
Darn, no details of Moses and Zipporah’s courtship. I agree with the rabbis when they said as Jethro got to know Moses, he approved of Moses. The “eat break” line (I used the King James Version of the Bible) is translated in other versions as “break bread.” “Break bread” might be a hint to Moses that he’d marry one of Jethro’s daughters. Zipporah might have heard this and made a plan to get Moses. Or Moses noticed her good qualities and went after her.
Or maybe the two fell in love through a song…to end this post, let’s watch The Prince of Egypt’s, “Through Heaven’s Eyes.”
P.S. The Hebrew slaves didn’t build the pyramids. That’s what my biblical lands teacher told me.
Featured image: Moses and his Ethiopian wife Zipporah by Jacob Jordaens. Public domain.
If their lives had crossed paths, would there have been any chance that they’d get together? Yes, yes, YES!
First of all they were the same religion. I’ve concluded that in all marriages—you better have the same standards.
Marie-Antoinette and Louis remind me of the couples that knew each other in high school and went to some of the same church functions, but hooked up after graduation. They became adults, noticed, and took a strong interest in each other.
Click here to read a more detailed analysis of this couple.
Featured image:Marie Antoinette, Emperor Maximilian and Louis XVI by Josef Hauzinger Josef Hauzinger public domain.
Catherine and Charles’ marriage didn’t end in divorce, but it wasn’t exactly a success. The man had many mistresses before and during their marriage, but the couple stayed on somewhat good terms.
Would Charles’ character had been different if he hadn’t had access to so many women? If he lived today, would he had signed up for an addiction recovery program?
Catherine had admirers herself. One man got fired from her service for getting too close with her. After Charles’ death, there were rumors she had a relationship with a Frenchman who had served her for years.
Maybe the mothers would still have played an important part in matchmaking; only this time it would be for everyday life, not making alliances between two countries. The mothers of this couple were both Catholics. Charles’ mother was happy when her decided to marry a good, Catholic girl.
Once again, religion is an important factor. Charles declared himself a Catholic at the end of his life, which is what Catherine had been her whole life.
I don’t know if they would have picked each at an ordinary party, but their marriage probably would have been better if they hadn’t been in high positions where they had opportunities to interact with questionable characters and temptations.
Featured Image: Charles II of England and Queen Catherine of Braganza (Dutch engraving, 3rd quarter of the 17th century)
Michal and David were both at the royal court, and David was working his way to have power—for which Michal was used. But what if Israel hadn’t wanted kings—would they have gotten married? It’s hard to say since they were from different tribes, and usually tribes of Israel stuck with their own. However, marrying into other tribes still occurred.
When it came to martial rules, though, Israel’s number one was “marry in the covenant.” They had the same religion, and that’s huge. Say that somehow they got “arranged.” Would the marriage have worked?
If they weren’t royal there would have been more privacy. Michal and David would have spent more time together. There wouldn’t have been much competition—if any—with other wives. The two would have had a better chance of having a family together.
Let’s fast-forward to today. There’s still much controversy around royal marriages. I will tie in Sarah Ferguson and Prince Andrew. The couple divorced, but Sarah still gives flowing reviews of her ex in public. In one interview, she said their marriage would have worked out if they had been “in normal life.”
Let’s say Michal and David had lived in a “normal life”—would their marriage have worked? I strongly believe it would have.
Featured image: David and Michal by Virginio Grana, 1865
Some think I’m too harsh on King David. It’s heartbreaking for sure when researching people that associated with him. His victims didn’t get that much justice during their lives. Here’s my biography about the man:
“King David’s Biography, A Poem”
King David gloried in his life and times
But tried to cover up his crimes.
He got caught in his lies
And his family cut ties.
He took too many wives
And destroyed many lives.
